|
|
|

Environmental Considerations
Please click a topic to expand
- Lab tested, fish oil supplements pure and likely safer than eating fish
Melanson SF, et al. Measurement of organochlorines in commercial
over-the-counter fish oil preparations: implications for
dietary and therapeutic recommendations for omega-3 fatty
acids. Arch Path Lab Med, 2005;129(1): 74-77.
CONTEXT: The consumption of fish high in omega-3 fatty acids
is advocated by the American Heart Association to decrease
the risk of coronary artery disease.
However, fish contain environmental toxins such as mercury,
polychlorinated biphenyls, and organochlorine pesticides,
which may negate the beneficial cardiovascular effects of
fish meals. Toxin levels vary depending on both the fish
source and the specific toxin, and neither farm-raised
nor wild fish are toxin free.
Fish oil supplements also prevent the progression of
coronary artery disease and reduce cardiovascular
mortality. However, only sparse data exist on the level of
toxins in fish oil. In a previous study we showed that the
amount of mercury in 5 over-the-counter brands of
fish oil was negligible.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the concentrations of polychlorinated
biphenyls and other organochlorines in 5
over-the-counter preparations of fish oil.
DESIGN: The contents of 5 commercial fish oil
brands were sent for organochlorine analysis.
RESULTS: The levels of polychlorinated biphenyls and
organochlorines were all below the detectable limit.
CONCLUSIONS: Fish oil supplements are more healthful than
the consumption of fish high in organochlorines.
Fish oils provide the benefits of omega-3 fatty acids
without the risk of toxicity.
In addition, fish oil supplements have been helpful in a
variety of diseases, including bipolar disorder and depression.
|
|
- Safety of fish oil supplements, negligible to nondetectable levels of mercury
Foran SE, Flood JG, Lewandrowski KB. Measurement of mercury
levels in concentrated over-the-counter fish oil
preparations: is fish oil healthier than fish? Arch Pathol
Lab Med, 2003; 127(12):1603-1605.
CONTEXT: Fish consumption has been associated with a decreased
risk of coronary artery disease. Recent studies have
illustrated that the high mercury content in cold-water
fish may negate the cardiovascular benefits of fish meals.
Fish oils have similar antiatherogenic properties to fish,
and similar studies should be performed to determine the
level of mercury in fish oils.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the concentration of mercury in 5
over-the-counter brands of fish oil.
RESULTS: The levels of mercury in the 5 different brands of
fish oil ranged from nondetectable (<6 microg/L) to
negligible (10-12 microg/L). The mercury content of
fish oil was similar to the basal concentration normally
found in human blood.
CONCLUSIONS: Fish are rich in omega-3 fatty acids, and their
consumption is recommended to decrease the risk of coronary
artery disease. However, fish such as swordfish and shark
are also a source of exposure to the heavy metal toxin,
mercury. The fish oil brands examined in this manuscript
have negligible amounts of mercury and may provide a
safer alternative to fish consumption.
|
|
- Mercury attenuates the benefits of fish oils, best avoided
Virtanen J, Voutilainen S. Mercury, Fish Oils, and Risk
of Acute Coronary Events and Cardiovascular Disease,
Coronary Heart Disease, and All-Cause Mortality in Men
in Eastern Finland. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and
Vascular Biology 2005;25:228.
Objective Mercury has been suggested to have negative
effects on cardiovascular health. We investigated the
effects of high mercury content in hair on the risk of
acute coronary events and cardiovascular and all-cause
mortality in men from eastern Finland.
Methods and Results The population-based prospective Kuopio
Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study (KIHD) cohort of
1871 Finnish men aged 42 to 60 years and free of previous
coronary heart disease (CHD) or stroke at baseline was
used. During an average follow-up time of 13.9 years, 282
acute coronary events and 132 cardiovascular disease (CVD),
91 CHD, and 525 all-cause deaths occurred. Men in the
highest third of hair mercury content (>2.03 g/g) had an
adjusted 1.60-fold (95% CI, 1.24 to 2.06) risk of acute
coronary event, 1.68-fold (95% CI, 1.15 to 2.44) risk of
CVD, 1.56-fold (95% CI, 0.99 to 2.46) risk of CHD, and
1.38-fold (95% CI, 1.15 to 1.66) risk of any death compared
with men in the lower two thirds. High mercury content in
hair also attenuated the protective effects of high-serum
docosahexaenoic acid plus docosapentaenoic acid concentration.
Conclusions High content of mercury in hair may be a risk
factor for acute coronary events and CVD, CHD, and all-cause
mortality in middle-aged eastern Finnish men. Mercury may
also attenuate the protective effects of fish on
cardiovascular health.
Mercury may increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases.
In this study, high mercury content in hair increased the
risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in middle-aged
Finnish men and attenuated the beneficial effects of fish
oils on cardiovascular health. Regular consumption of fish
with high mercury content should be avoided.
|
|
- BBC News - Pollutants link to diabetes risk
Exposure to high levels of a class of environmental
pollutants may increase the risk of developing type 2
diabetes, research suggests.
A team from the University of Lund in Sweden found people
exposed to high levels of persistent organochlorine
pollutants (POPs) seemed more at risk.
POPs are most likely to come from eating
fatty fish such as salmon.
The study, of 196 fishermen and their wives, is published
in the journal Environmental Health.
POPs are a family of toxic chemicals that includes
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and the insecticide DDT.
They are by-products of industrial and agricultural
processes and are widespread in the environment.
The Lund team analysed blood samples from the volunteers
for levels of a POP residue called CB-153, and DDE,
the main by-product of DDT.
Significantly higher levels of both chemicals were found in
the blood of the 6% of men and 5% of women who had type 2 diabetes.
Previous research has suggested that toxic chemicals like
POPs may decrease the ability of the body's cells to take
up glucose. Another theory is that the chemicals may trigger
complex interactions which disrupt the body's
ability to break down fats.
Unusual circumstances
Researcher Dr Lars Hagmar told the BBC News website that
people should not worry about eating oily fish. He said
the fishermen and their wives in the study were exposed
to exceptionally high levels of pollutants.
The Baltic coast, where they ply their trade, had been
heavily polluted with POPs from industry, he said. The
water was also shallow and cold, meaning that pollutants
took a long time to start to degrade.
The Baltic Sea was also surrounded by land with relatively
little circulation of its waters, so pollutants were not
as readily dispersed as they were in other bodies of water.
Amanda Eden, a care advisor at Diabetes UK, said: "While this
study looks interesting, more extensive research is required
before we can draw any firm conclusions of a link between
these toxins and Type 2 diabetes.
"What we do know is that, a healthy, balanced diet and regular
physical activity can help reduce the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes.
"We also recommend that people aim to eat oily fish such as
salmon or mackerel twice a week as part of a healthy, balanced diet."
Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4478192.stm
|
|
- Environmental report on health risks associated with farm raised salmon
Foran J, Carpenter D, et al. Risk-Based Consumption Advice
for Farmed Atlantic and Wild Pacific Salmon Contaminated
with Dioxins and Dioxin-like Compounds. Environ Health
Perspect. 2005;113(5):552-557
We reported recently that several organic contaminants
occurred at elevated concentrations in farmed Atlantic
salmon compared with concentrations of the same contaminants
in wild Pacific salmon [Hites et al.
Science 303: 226-229 (2004)].
We also found that polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),
toxaphene, dieldrin, dioxins, and polybrominated diphenyl
ethers occurred at higher concentrations in European
farm-raised salmon than in farmed
salmon from North and South America.
Health risks (based on a quantitative cancer risk assessment)
associated with consumption of farmed salmon contaminated
with PCBs, toxaphene, and dieldrin were higher than risks
associated with exposure to the same contaminants in wild salmon.
Here we present information on cancer and noncancer health
risks of exposure to dioxins in farmed and wild salmon.
The analysis is based on a tolerable intake level for
dioxin-like compounds established by the World Health
Organization and on risk estimates for human exposure
to dioxins developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Consumption of farmed salmon at relatively low frequencies
results in elevated exposure to dioxins and dioxin-like
compounds with commensurate elevation in estimates of health risk.
Source: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/504661_1
|
|
- Moms and Mercury
- Nutrients in fish vital for infant cognitive development: moms need the nutrients
without the mercury
Moms and Mercury by Ernie Hood. Fine-Tuning Fish
Consumption During Pregnancy. Environmental Health
Perspectives, 2005;113:1376-1380.
EHP is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news
on the impact of the environment on human health.
Due to ongoing concerns that high mercury intake via fish
can cause adverse neurologic effects in the developing
fetus, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration now recommends
that expectant mothers should limit their consumption of
fish to two or fewer meals per week. But pregnant women
shouldn't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
A new study by a group of Harvard researchers suggests that
this advice, which could result in many pregnant women
eliminating fish from their diets altogether, may be
denying some babies substantial neurocognitive benefits
gained from important nutrients found in fish, such
as n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids.
The scientists sought to determine whether fish consumption
during pregnancy is harmful or beneficial
to fetal brain development.
To do this, they examined associations of maternal fish
consumption during pregnancy, maternal hair mercury levels
(a sensitive marker of organic mercury body burden) at
delivery, and infant cognition at age 6 months. Study
subjects were 135 mother-infant pairs who participated
in Project Viva, a prospective pregnancy and child health
cohort study in eastern Massachusetts.
The mothers completed questionnaires about fish consumption
during their second trimester. That period of time was used
to best coordinate temporally with the mercury exposure
reflected in maternal hair samples, which were taken at
delivery. The questions concerned how much and what
categories of fish (canned tuna, dark meat, light meat,
shellfish) the women ate.
Mothers consumed an average of 1.2 servings of combined fish
categories per week. Their mean hair mercury level was 0.55
part per million (ppm), with 10% of the samples higher than
1.2 ppm, the current U.S. reference dose. Fish consumption
was directly correlated with hair mercury levels.
Infant cognition was assessed using a test called visual
recognition memory (VRM). In the VRM test, which has been
shown to correlate with later IQ, the child is first shown
two identical photographs of an infant's face, side by side,
at a standardized distance. Then, one of the photos is
replaced with a photo of another infant's face.
By tracking the percentage of time the baby looks at each
photo, a novelty preference score is derived, reflecting the
infant's ability to encode a stimulus into memory, to
recognize that stimulus, and to look preferentially at
a novel stimulus.
Mean VRM score among the children was 59.8, with a range of
10.9-92.5. After accounting for characteristics such as
maternal age and education level, higher fish intake was
found to be associated with higher infant cognition,
especially after adjusting for mercury levels, which had
a dose-dependent negative impact on the infants' cognition.
For each additional weekly serving of fish, the infants' VRM
score was 4.0 points higher. Conversely, the researchers found
that an increase of 1 ppm in hair mercury was associated
with a decrement in VRM score of 7.5 points.
The babies with the highest cognition scores were from mothers
who had eaten more than two weekly fish servings but had
mercury levels of 1.2 ppm or less.
Although the results may seem contradictory, the authors
suggest that the most cognitive benefit is derived by
mothers eating fish types with the combination of
relatively little mercury and high amounts of beneficial nutrients.
However, since the study assessed maternal fish consumption
of four broad categories, there is no information presented
on associations with specific types of fish. The researchers
say that future studies could incorporate more detailed
dietary information to help pregnant women make informed
decisions about which fish meals are better or worse for
their children's cognition.
Ultimately, the message behind these findings is that
pregnant women should continue to eat fish, but should try
to choose varieties known to be low in mercury and high in
nutrients, such as canned light tuna and sardines.
Finding the most appropriate balance between risk and benefit
may be challenging in this situation, but given the strong
associations found in the current study, making the right
decisions about which fish to eat during pregnancy, and how
often, may be even more important than previously suspected.
|
|
- Exposure to Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in moms impacts sex ratio of offspring
MG Weisskopf, HA Anderson, LP Hanrahan, and Great
Lakes Consortium.
Decreased sex ratio following maternal exposure to
polychlorinated biphenyls from contaminated Great Lakes
sport-caught fish: a retrospective cohort study.
Environ Health,2003;2(1):
Background
Fish from the Great Lakes are contaminated with polychlorinated
biphenyls, which have been found to have several adverse
reproductive effects. Several environmental contaminants
have been found to alter the sex ratio of offspring at
birth, but the evidence of such an effect of polychlorinated
biphenyls has been inconsistent.
Methods
We examined parental serum polychlorinated biphenyl
concentration in relation to the sex ratio of 173 children
of mothers and 208 children of fathers from the Great Lakes
region of the United States between 1970 and 1995. We
calculated odds ratios for a male child using logistic
regression and generalized estimating equations with
adjustment for the year of birth of the child, maternal and
paternal age, the mother's parity at the child's birth, and
whether the child had an older brother.
Results
The adjusted odds ratio for having a male child among mothers
in the highest quintile of serum polychlorinated biphenyl
concentration was 0.18 (95% CI: 0.06-0.59) compared to mothers
in the lowest quintile. Treating exposure as a continuous
variable, the adjusted odds ratio for having a male child
was 0.54 per unit increase in the natural log of maternal
serum polychlorinated biphenyl concentration (95% CI: 0.33-0.89).
There was little evidence of an association with paternal exposure.
We found no association between either maternal or paternal
serum dichlorodiphenyl-dichloroethene
concentration and the sex ratio.
Conclusions
These findings suggest that maternal exposure to
polychlorinated biphenyls may decrease the sex ratio of
offspring. These data add to the growing body of evidence
that exposure to particular chemicals can
alter the sex ratio at birth.
|
|
- Benefit-risk
analysis suggests individuals cannot consume recommended EPA & DHA levels from
diet alone, and of particular concern among pregnant and children
Foran JA, Good DH, et al. Quantitative Analysis of the
Benefits and Risks of Consuming Farmed and Wild Salmon.
J. Nutr., 2005;135:2639-2643.
Contaminants in farmed Atlantic and wild Pacific salmon raise
important questions about the competing health benefits
and risks of fish consumption.
A benefit-risk analysis was conducted to compare quantitatively
the cancer and noncancer risks of exposure to organic
contaminants in salmon with the (n-3) fatty acid?associated
health benefits of salmon consumption.
Recommended levels of (n-3) fatty acid intake, as eicosapentaenoic
acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), may be achieved
by consuming farmed or wild salmon while maintaining an
acceptable level of noncarcinogenic risk.
However, the recommended level of EPA+DHA intake cannot be
achieved solely from farmed or wild salmon while maintaining
an acceptable level of carcinogenic risk.
Although the benefit-risk ratio for carcinogens and noncarcinogens
is significantly greater for wild Pacific salmon than for
farmed Atlantic salmon as a group, the ratio for some
subgroups of farmed salmon is on par with the
ratio for wild salmon.
This analysis suggests that risk of exposure to contaminants
in farmed and wild salmon is partially offset
by the fatty acid?associated health benefits.
However, young children, women of child-bearing age, pregnant
women, and nursing mothers not at significant risk for
sudden cardiac death associated with CHD but concerned
with health impairments such as reduction in IQ and
other cognitive and behavioral effects, can minimize
contaminant exposure by choosing the least contaminated
wild salmon or by selecting other sources of (n-3) fatty acids.
|
|
- News - Fish oil fights the effect of smog on the heart
By Kathleen Doheny
HealthDay Reporter
Daily supplements of fatty acid-rich fish oil may counteract
the effects of air pollution on the heart, researchers report.
"The cardiac responses to air pollutants were dramatically
reduced in those on fatty acids," said Dr. Fernando Holguin,
an assistant professor of medicine at Emory University
School of Medicine. He presented the research this week
at the American Thoracic Society's annual meeting in San Diego.
Holguin's team tracked the cardiac health of 50 elderly
people, all nursing home residents averaging 70 years of
age and living in smog-plagued Mexico City.
Each resident received a one-gram oil capsule twice a day
(once in the morning and again in the evening) containing
omega-3 fatty acids. Half of the group received fish oil
capsules and the other half soy oil capsules.
The researchers took ongoing measurements of each participant's
cardiac function, focusing specifically on their heart rate
variability. Heart-rate variability refers to the heart
rate alterations from beat to beat.
"Exposure to the particles of air pollution reduces heart
rate variability, and taking the omega-3 fatty acids
increased it," Holguin explained. "Increased heart rate
variability reduces heart disease risk."
The fish oil was much better at keeping heart rate healthy
than was the soy oil, the Emory team found. "Those on soy
oil had just marginal protection," Holguin said, while
"those on fish oil had a complete abolishment of the effect
of the [smog] particles on the heart."
Another expert, Dr. Zi-Jian Xu, a staff cardiologist at Santa
Monica-UCLA Medical Center and an assistant clinical professor
of medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA,
said he is not surprised by the results. "Fish oil has been
found to reduce cardiovascular events, mainly heart attack
and stroke," he said. "It has also been shown to modestly
reduce the risk of another heart attack. The theory is that
omega-3 fatty acids can improve cardiovascular health."
The new finding is also consistent with previous research, Xu added.
Holguin advises that people follow the advice of the American
Heart Association (AHA) with regards to
their daily intake of omega-3 fatty acids.
The AHA currently recommends that individuals with documented
heart disease eat about one gram of omega-3 fatty
acids a day, preferably from fatty fish.
Source: http://healthinfo.cedars-sinai.edu/healthnews/healthday/050526HD525935.htm
|
|
- News - Women living in coastal areas are found to have higher mercury levels
Women in Coastal Areas Are Found to Have Higher Mercury Levels
By Juliet Eilperin
By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Women in coastal communities have twice as much mercury in
their blood as those living inland, according to an analysis
by an Environmental Protection Agency scientist.
The preliminary findings, based on a survey of 3,600 women
conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
between 1999 and 2002, provide fresh evidence of the link
between fish consumption and concentrations of methylmercury,
a neurotoxin that causes developmental problems in young children.
The study focused on the 10 percent of women with the highest
mercury levels, and in that group, it found that inland residents
had an average level of 2.4 parts per billion, compared
with 5.9 parts per billion for coastal residents. EPA
guidelines hold that mercury levels higher than 3.5 parts
per billion pose a possible health threat.
Mercury, spewed into the air in emissions from power plants
and other sources, ends up in water and accumulates in
predator fish such as tuna and swordfish. In pregnant
women with high levels, methylmercury crosses the placenta
and can affect the developing brain of the fetus.
"What's evident in these data is there's a real difference
between the coastal and non-coastal" women, said Kathryn
Mahaffey, who conducted the analysis as director of the
EPA's division of exposure assessment, coordination and
policy. "The message is people need to eat a variety of
foods and, when choosing fish species, they need to choose
more than one type of fish."
The EPA recommends that women of childbearing age limit their
albacore tuna consumption to six ounces, or an average meal,
a week. The agency suggests that women eat as much as 12
ounces a week of fish or shellfish that are lower in
mercury, such as salmon, shrimp and trout.
Mahaffey said agency scientists did not obtain a detailed
diet breakdown from the women, but they assumed that those
living in coastal areas ate more fish. A study published
this year found that French women living on the coast
consume three times as much fish as those living inland.
American women living on the Atlantic Coast had much higher
mercury levels than those living on the Pacific or Gulf
coasts. Atlantic Coast residents had average levels of
7.7 parts per billion, while women on the Pacific had
levels of 4.7 and women on the Gulf Coast had 3.2 parts per billion.
Mahaffey said she could not account for the discrepancy,
adding, "Fish are just not all the same."
The study, obtained by The Washington Post from the nonprofit
Natural Resources News Service, also indicated that wealthier
women were more likely than poor women to have elevated
mercury levels. Women earning less than $20,000 annually
had an average level of 2.8 parts per billion, while
women earning more than $20,000 had 3.9 parts per billion.
Environmentalists said the survey -- along with another this
week in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives that
showed Asian, Pacific Islander and Native American women have
higher mercury levels than women from other backgrounds --
should remind Americans of the health dangers contaminated
fish can pose.
"It reaffirms there's a strong connection to ocean fish,
but that's not to say non-coastal residents are safe,"
said Jackie Savitz, who directs the seafood contamination
campaign at Oceana, an advocacy group. "Alarms should
really be sounded for everyone."
Oceana has lobbied grocery store chains -- including
Safeway, Wal-Mart and Whole Foods -- to post signs
identifying which fish are high in mercury.
Source: washingtonpost.com
|
|
- Useful link to info on Mercury and seafood
This web site is a project of the Program on Agriculture
and Animal Health Policy (PAAHP) of the Center for Food, Nutrition,
and Agriculture Policy (CFNAP) at the University of Maryland.
The project is intended to help scientists, the public, the
media and policy makers understand the range of published
studies and analyses on the important issue of mercury and seafood.
Source: http://www.realmercuryfacts.org/
|
|
|
|